Geologists determine age of Bluff Point landslide

By Ed Berg, Dick Reger and Bretwood Higman
Special to the Tribune

Photo by Ian Reid of Eagle Eye Gallery Aerial view of the Bluff Point Landslide taken at a recent -5.3’ low tide. The slide originally extended to the edge of the boulder field, but has been eroded back 400-600 yards to the present beach bluff.  The sandy beach in front of the boulder field is only exposed at tides of -5.0 or more.

Photo by Ian Reid of Eagle Eye Gallery
Aerial view of the Bluff Point Landslide taken at a recent -5.3’ low tide. The slide originally extended to the edge of the boulder field, but has been eroded back 400-600 yards to the present beach bluff. The sandy beach in front of the boulder field is only exposed at tides of -5.0 or more.

Many Homerites remember when they first came down the Sterling Highway and stopped at the Baycrest Overlook. The view of Kachemak Bay, the mountains and Cook Inlet is totally commanding and can reset a humble traveler’s life priorities in a heartbeat.
Also to be seen, looking west from the overlook, is an enormous gap in the bluff, now floored with a pristine wilderness of grassy meadows, dense alders and spruce, and four small ponds. This mile-wide chasm was made by a massive collapse of the bluff, called the Bluff Point Landslide.
Our question: when did this landslide happen?
As geologists, we try to put a date on everything, even if just to the nearest million years or so. One of us (Dick Reger) published a geological report in 1979 with radiocarbon dates of 1,100 and 1,500 years ago on pieces of trees in the deposits overlying the landslide deposits. But those trees could have lived thousands of years after the original slide, and then been exposed during more recent, secondary slumping due to beach erosion. The whole slide mass is continually resettling and slumping as the end of the slide is removed by winter storms.
Last summer, we had the good fortune to find an intact lens of soil that somehow was transported downhill within the slide without being turned into random debris. The soil lens was exposed for 50 feet along the base of the bluff by strong wave action during the 2012-13 winter. It showed a crusty black organic layer on top, underlain by several feet of silty-sandy soil that graded downward from dark reddish purple to buff to gray.
Several small tree roots stuck out of the soil; a volcanic ash layer was also present. The intact soil-bearing sliver was surrounded by highly deformed slide material. The soil was quite mature, having formed during at least several thousand years. We sent three root samples to the University of California-Irvine for radiocarbon dating, and all three samples dated to about 2,250 years. We think that 2,250 years is a very good estimate for the age of the slide, because the roots were in growth position and would have died when they were deeply buried by the slide mass.
The full extent of the landslide can only be seen during an extreme -5.0-foot or lower tide, when a sandy beach is exposed beyond the slide boulder field. Many of the boulders exposed at low tide were transported to Bluff Point by a glacial advance that half filled Kachemak Bay about 17,000 years ago.
This glacial expansion is known as the Killey Advance (after the Killey River). The Killey moraine rested in the Bluff Point area for about 15,000 years, and then was instantly ferried out into Kachemak Bay by the landslide event.
During the past 2,250 years, wave erosion has whittled the slide mass back 400-600 yards, leaving a thick lag of boulders that is only exposed during low tides. The soil we found was probably originally deposited as sandy silt in seawater beside the Killey ice lobe, because we saw small rocks (drop stones) in the soil that had been dropped from floating ice.
When the bluff collapsed, it probably did not simply drop straight down. Typically in such collapses, a large block rotates downward along a curving failure plane, which is steeply dipping at the top but flattens out below to form a spoon-shaped surface. During failure, the outer edge of the sliding block rotates upward, leaving a depression behind it. The four ponds on the Bluff Point Landslide formed in this low area.
Along the beach, you can see coal beds tipped up and dipping steeply to the northwest. Farther out — during very low tides — you can see coal beds dipping in other directions, with some beds overturned where the slide mass was more chaotically deformed. The coal beds are undisturbed in the bluff above the slide, and remain more or less horizontal.
Mapping indicates that there have been several landslides around Bluff Point. Looking at Google Earth, you can see a strip about 2.7 miles long extending on both sides of the main slide, with collapse deposits at the base of the bluff.

Photo Provided In this bare-earth LiDAR image all tree and shrub cover has been digitally removed to show topographic detail. The wrinkled surface above the beach bluff shows recent slumping of the slide mass as the bluff is actively eroded back by wave attack. Colors show elevation.

Photo Provided
In this bare-earth LiDAR image all tree and shrub cover has been digitally removed to show topographic detail. The wrinkled surface above the beach bluff shows recent slumping of the slide mass as the bluff is actively eroded back by wave attack. Colors show elevation.

In July 2009, between Bluff Point and Diamond Creek, the high bluff face collapsed like a hammer onto the upper end of an old slide block, rotating the block like a teeter-totter and pushing up a very strange 15-foot-high mound in the intertidal zone for a distance of 1,200 feet along the beach. Rotated shale layers in the center of the mound were nearly vertical. Over the following winter the mound was completely removed by wave erosion.
People were living in Kachemak Bay when the Bluff Point Landslide occurred 2,250 years ago. The Marine Kachemak Tradition culture had already been here for 800 years and would be here for another 1,000 years. The dumping of so much sediment into the Bay must have disrupted fish and sea mammal populations. It would be interesting to examine the rich legacy of artifacts left by those people to see if there is any cultural expression of this event.
It is quite likely that the Bluff Point Landslide was triggered by a large 1964-style subduction zone earthquake. Ian Sheenan of Durham University (UK) and colleagues have dated five major pre-1964 earthquakes over the last 3,000 years, two of which dated at 2,140 and 2,415 years ago. (The last one was 900 years ago.) There are typically errors of 100-200 years with radiocarbon dates, so either of these earthquakes would be possible candidates.

Ed Berg, PhD, has taught geology at the Kenai Peninsula College since 1983. In 2010 he retired as an ecologist from the US Fish & Wildlife Service at the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. He will be teaching his five-week Geology of Kachemak Bay class at the Kenai Peninsula College starting Tuesday, Sept. 9.
Dick Reger, PhD, is a consulting geologist who retired from the Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys; he is the author of many publications on the glacial geology of the Kenai Peninsula and northern Alaska.
Bretwood Higman, PhD, is a geologist with Ground Truth Trekking.

Contact the writer
Posted by on Aug 12th, 2014 and filed under More News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed

Like us on Facebook