<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Protecting belugas ‘right’ and reasonable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homertribune.com/2010/03/protecting-belugas-%e2%80%98right%e2%80%99-and-reasonable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homertribune.com/2010/03/protecting-belugas-%e2%80%98right%e2%80%99-and-reasonable/</link>
	<description>Homer, Alaska</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:28:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wes Cannon</title>
		<link>http://homertribune.com/2010/03/protecting-belugas-%e2%80%98right%e2%80%99-and-reasonable/comment-page-1/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Cannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homertribune.com/?p=7542#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Good &#039;ol Ted, when he brought pork to Alaska, it was ok as long as it benefits certain agendas but not for a bridge between Anchorage and PT Mackenzie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good &#8216;ol Ted, when he brought pork to Alaska, it was ok as long as it benefits certain agendas but not for a bridge between Anchorage and PT Mackenzie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blunderbuss</title>
		<link>http://homertribune.com/2010/03/protecting-belugas-%e2%80%98right%e2%80%99-and-reasonable/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Blunderbuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homertribune.com/?p=7542#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>This is an eloquent article reaching out to those most likely to oppose this plan, but it is almost entirely uninformative regarding the issue at hand. Conservatives will not support an endangered species plan just because Ronald Reagan held conservation dear, but rather based on evidence. I would like to see a factual article refuting the objections that have been raised, and proving that this plan is essential. I haven&#039;t seen that yet. I don&#039;t know of a single person who wants to see the belugas vanish, but many feel that the bad in this plan outweighs the good. They will only be convinced by factual reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an eloquent article reaching out to those most likely to oppose this plan, but it is almost entirely uninformative regarding the issue at hand. Conservatives will not support an endangered species plan just because Ronald Reagan held conservation dear, but rather based on evidence. I would like to see a factual article refuting the objections that have been raised, and proving that this plan is essential. I haven&#8217;t seen that yet. I don&#8217;t know of a single person who wants to see the belugas vanish, but many feel that the bad in this plan outweighs the good. They will only be convinced by factual reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
